Sarah Wilson's beautiful pimped bike →

October 17, 2014 |

My bike is the most valuable material possession I own, apart from my couch, if we’re talking from a financial POV. From an attachment POV, my bike is number one by a mile.

I’m attached. The reason is this…it represents a story and a process. Allow me to share the story (it does have a point).

I totally get where she’s coming from. There’s something special about an object with a past life going back decades. It’s a feeling you won’t find on a new bicycle, no matter how much you spend. Classic road bikes from the 70’s or so are incredible feats of craftsmanship. Those things were built to last a lifetime, and many of them are still actively being used every day.

I’d much prefer to put $500 towards restoring a classic, handmade italian frame than spending them on a new bike.

Come to think of it, I actually did. But that’s a story for another day.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

Marco Arment compares the Retina iMac and the Mac Pro (on paper) →

October 17, 2014 |

Marco has an excellent and thorough article on the differences between both models:

The 5K Retina iMac is out, and it looks incredible so far on paper — so incredible that I’m seriously considering selling my new Mac Pro to get the Retina iMac instead. In fact, the case for the Mac Pro for anyone but advanced video editors, 3D modelers, and heavy OpenCL users is now weaker than ever.

I’ve always found the iMac to be a near perfect computer but now it’s getting ridiculous. Even the completely redesigned Mac Pro compares poorly, particularly considering it won’t be getting an external Retina display anytime soon:

It may be possible to use two Thunderbolt 2 cables to power a 5K display, but only if the GPU could treat each port as its own full-bandwidth DisplayPort 1.2 channel, the sum of which represented one logical display, and had the panel using something like MST to combine the two at the other end. But the only Mac with more than one Thunderbolt bus (not port) is the current Mac Pro, and I can’t see today’s Apple shipping an external display that none of their laptops can use.

If you’re in the market for a high-end desktop computer, the Retina iMac looks like a no-brainer.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

Jason Snell's first thoughts about the Apple event →

October 17, 2014 |

Speaking of Jason Snell:

Let’s step through that one again. People will forsake their Mac Pros for this iMac, until there comes a day when a screen like this is available as an external display option for the Mac Pro. For $2500 or less. People who would never have considered buying an iMac will buy this iMac.

I have to say, I agree. I haven’t even seen this iMac yet, and I already want it. A few months ago I said I probably wouldn’t replace my current iMac — a 24-inch Early 2008 model — until it died on me, but an iMac with a Retina display is a whole different animal.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢
♤ ♧ ♡ ♢
♤ ♧ ♡ ♢
♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

Apple temporarily pulls blood glucose measurements from Health app

October 16, 2014

Federico Viticci and Stephen Hackett today pointed out that Apple is temporarily pulling support for blood glucose measurements from the Health app. I know it sounds serious, but here’s why it’s probably not a big deal.

The truth is, blood glucose measurement support in the Health app is ridiculously rudimentary as it is, even if it worked properly. A typical person with diabetes needs to monitor their blood sugar levels anywhere from 3 to 10 times a day, sometimes even more (you need to take additional tests in case of hypoglycemia, which is a fairly common event). There’s no way a significant portion of those people are going to take the extra effort to manually log each and every measurement in the Health app. I know I don’t, and if this feature has failed to encourage me — an Apple enthusiast and technologically savvy young man — to use it, its chances of convincing regular users are pretty slim.

Blood glucose tracking in the Health app, at least in its current incarnation, is an irrelevant feature, because all diabetics already have a device that can do that for them: the very glucose meter they use to take the measurement in the first place. All glucose meters have a built-in memory to store the user’s history, and virtually all of them offer ways to export and/or visualize that data.

The ability to manually log blood glucose measurements on an iPhone app is a complementary feature, for example in case you forget your glucose meter and need to borrow another device (I’ve tested my levels using my father’s glucose meter occasionally). It’s nice to have it, but it’s by no means an essential or particularly compelling feature.

As a central repository of data, the Health app makes sense, but it will only be really useful for diabetics if one of these things happen first:

  • Either Apple implements support for automatic data transfer between the Health app and several commercially available blood glucose meters (ideally the most popular ones), or…

  • …3rd-party apps implement this support and share the blood glucose data with the Health app. In this case, though, the Health app becomes redundant because the 3rd-party app would surely support some sort of data visualization features itself. It would also be unlikely, because due to the medical nature of this data (and hence, its confidentiality), I’m not sure a 3rd-party developer would be legally able — let alone inclined — to share that data with anyone.

The blood glucose feature in the Health app, as it stands today, is merely an afterthought on Apple’s part. This bug itself is proof of that: failing to consider both mg/dL and mmol/L as valid units is not just an oversight, it’s one of the very first things a developer has to deal with — and one of the most important ones — when designing a diabetes-related app. The fact that they didn’t clearly shows that it’s not a priority for them.

In the end, the only sensible thing they could do is pull the feature. It’s much better to not have a feature, than to have a poorly implemented version of one, particularly in an app as important as Health. I hope they take their time to fix it and bring it back with the support it deserves, because otherwise it will continue to be irrelevant to most diabetics. And that would be a shame.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

John Gruber's talk at XOXO 2014 →

October 16, 2014 |

Fantastic talk by John Gruber at XOXO 2014. He talked about his beginnings as an independent writer, and what it took to make Daring Fireball viable as a business. There are plenty of valuable lessons to be learned here.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

After a brief introduction to single malt Scotch whisky, this is where the fun begins. For my first ever single malt tasting, I have selected none other than the best-selling single malt in the world: Glenfiddich 12 Year Old.

Master of Malt

Before I begin, though, I’d like to say a quick word about Master of Malt. When I decided to embark upon this journey, I knew I would need a way to procure several whiskies that are pretty difficult to find here in Madrid. Furthermore, since they were only for tasting purposes, I wanted to be able to buy them in small quantities. Scotch whisky can get pretty expensive surprisingly quickly, and I wasn’t exactly looking forward to investing hundreds of dollars in bottles I’m not yet able to appreciate anyway.

Luckily, the fine folks at Master of Malt solved all of these issues with ease. They sell drinks by the dram, which are beautifully bottled in miniature, 3 cl bottles and then sealed with wax. They’re pretty affordable too, with a typical dram going for about 4-6 bucks, so I ordered every whisky on my tasting list from them. All in all, I ordered eleven premium drams and my order still came in at less than $100, shipping included. Talk about a no-brainer.

I received my order in only two working days, neatly packaged in three separate cardboard containers:

Inside each container there’s room for up to five drams. Since I had ordered eleven drams, they came divided in groups of four, four and three.

I love the wax seals, they add a touch of luxury while preserving the full aroma of the whisky. This is attention to detail where it matters, not just for show, and it’s great.

Besides, each dram is identified with a beautifully designed label that contains all the necessary information, including the name of the whisky and its alcoholic content.

All this to say, I’m extremely happy with Master of Malt. Their impressive selection and fast, reliable shipping will allow me to explore the world of single malt whisky for years to come, all without breaking the bank in the process. I really couldn’t have asked for a better solution.

And now without further ado, let’s get down to business.

The Glenfiddich name

The Glenfiddich distillery was founded by William Grant in 1886 and is still one of the very few privately owned distilleries in all of Scotland. It is currently managed by the fifth generation of William Grant’s descendants. Glenfiddich means “Valley of the Deer” in Gaelic, where the distillery has been located since its foundation.

(Photo credit: Karsten May)

Glenfiddich produces all of its whisky on site, using water from the Robbie Dhu springs, and it’s the only distillery in the world that produces all of its whisky from a single source of fresh water.

The iconic triangular bottle, designed by Hans Schleger, has been associated with the Glenfiddich brand ever since its introduction in 1957.

Glenfiddich 12

Glenfiddich 12 Year Old

The younger expression from Glenfiddich’s core range, Glenfiddich 12 Year Old is matured using American bourbon and Spanish sherry oak casks for at least 12 years.

I would describe this whisky’s color as yellow, with golden tones shining through. On the official product website, it is described as “golden”. Using this color chart from Whisky Magazine, I would say that Glenfiddich 12 lies somewhere between 0.6 (old gold) and 0.8 (deep gold). Click on the image to view it full-size.

For reference, here’s a comparison shot between Glenmorangie The Original 10 Year Old (0.2-0.3), Glenfiddich 12 Year Old and Glenmorangie Quinta Ruban 12 Year Old (1.4-1.5). The color difference is even more apparent in real life.

Under normal circumstances, there is much to be learned about a whisky from its color alone. The type of casks used, the length of maturation and many other interesting details all manage to show up in its final appearance. Unfortunately, many houses today use caramel coloring (E150) to tweak the color of their whisky, including Glenfiddich. As such, there’s not much more I can say about it without incurring in wild speculation.

There’s a fair amount of controversy in the industry about whether common practices like chill-filtering or coloring affect the final taste of the whisky in a meaningful way. Some blind tasting experiments suggest that they do not, but the matter is far from settled.

For a company like Glenfiddich, that ships millions of bottles a year, these are necessary evils to guarantee the consistency of their brand. From that perspective, smaller distilleries can afford to be more respectful of the traditional process, with small variations across different bottlings serving as proof of their uniqueness. These smaller houses have found great success within the purist community, and are becoming more entrenched in their ways as they find a viable business. At the end of the day, though, these are different markets and it’s normal to have different companies using different approaches to market their products.

The nose

According to All Things Whisky, the nose of the Glenfiddich 12 can be described as gentle:

You can safely stick your beak right into the glass without eyes watering, and pull in a deep breath. The rewards are sweet fruit and light spice. Apple and chunky pear. Perhaps vanilla. Something refreshing there as well.

I most certainly agree. It’s easy on the nose, not nearly as overpowering as other whiskies I’ve tried. Though I’m not picking up nearly as many details, the pear is quite evident, and I can also identify some vanilla undertones. However, this is not a whisky that grabs your attention and doesn’t let go. Quite the contrary, in fact. While it doesn’t send you on a trip down memory lane, it is perfectly pleasant. I would characterize it as well-rounded, and balanced. Adding a few drops of water opens it up quite a bit and makes it much more enjoyable, in my opinion.

The palate

Again, All Things Whisky:

The simplicity of development is the biggest charm here, I believe. Arrival is sweet and fruity. A little bit of spice and creamy vanilla. A little woody. This isn’t one that unravels slowly and allows you to pull strands of flavor out individually, instead it is a nicely layered whisky that gives it all to you at once. I have read of others picking out hints of peat and nut, but…not really seeing it. The finish is pleasantly long, and the aftertaste mild.

This is a straightforward drink that doesn’t play games. While it does get easier on my tongue towards the bottom of the glass, its taste doesn’t evolve beyond that initial impression at any point. Perhaps that’s why it didn’t really sweep me off my feet, despite having been drinking it for the better part of a week.

I’ll give them this, though: its consistency is remarkable. I’ve tried several different bottles; I’ve tried it early in the evening, late at night and even one morning that I was feeling particularly brave, and it was always exactly the same. In a way, Glenfiddich 12 is like that old friend we all have: you may not have seen him in a long time but when you do, all it takes is five minutes with him to send you right back.

I could see myself coming back to this whisky every now and then, whenever I feel nostalgic and want a familiar taste. That’s well within my character, and I imagine I’m not alone.

The finish

I would say it’s medium, or medium-long. It stays with you effortlessly between sips, just long enough for a relaxed drinking session. It will not linger on for hours after you’re done, though.

Perfect for

Any and all situations where the drink is not the focus of your attention. If you’re watching an episode of Mad Men after a long day, pour yourself a glass and sit closer to the TV. If you’re having drinks with your friends, this is something that won’t distract you from an interesting conversation, but also won’t diminish your enjoyment of it in any way.

There’s another situation where this whisky excels. Glenfiddich 12 is almost the perfect drink to order when you’re on a trip far away from home:1 it never fails, and if they only stock one single malt at a bar, chances are it’s going to be this one. Think of it as a landmark that can give you a sense of firm ground when you’re surrounded by the unknown. An anchor. I know I’ve needed that sometimes.

Overall impression

You can go to McDonald’s pretty much anywhere in the world and I can guarantee you that their hamburgers will taste exactly the same. And when people go to McDonald’s it’s not because they want the best hamburger; it’s because they want a McDonald’s hamburger. Businesses like McDonald’s thrive not because they’re the best, but because they are extremely consistent. The familiar has a powerful pull, and that’s the angle Glenfiddich is playing.2

This impressive consistency is why I’m considering using the Glenfiddich 12 as a sort of benchmarking tool: whenever I have doubts about a certain whisky, I will go back to this one — or one of its older brothers — and reassess my perception of the two.

I have a pretty long journey ahead of me, but something tells me that as a stepping stone, Glenfiddich 12 was probably the perfect choice. Beyond that though, I’ll be honest: I suspect this is not a dram I’ll be excitedly drinking ten years from now. It’s perfectly good, just not terribly interesting. And I’ve always been a fan of interesting characters.

  1. Somewhere other than Scotland, of course. Or Ireland. Or Japan. You get the idea.

  2. Not to say that Glenfiddich is the McDonald’s of single malts.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢

Macworld Expo is over →

October 14, 2014 |

Jason Snell:

While technically this is a “hiatus,” I think it’s safe to assume that the Macworld Expo as we knew it won’t come back. Maybe it will take some other form—there are lots of amazing Apple-themed events out there—but I’ve got my doubts. The MacIT conference is a good one, and I’m glad it will be continuing.

Sad news.

♤ ♧ ♡ ♢